Using eportfolios to encourage responsible feedback
This article aims to look at the value that ePortfolios can add to business studies, specifically in the financial field. In order to answer the question, Do ePortfolios contribute to the development and enhancement of responsible feedback in the classroom?, the study analyzed the work done by postgraduate students pursuing a Master’s degree in finance. A total of 151 ePortfolios were reviewed and analyzed, and a selection of comments from students is presented in order to support the main findings of the literature review. The authors considered this approach to be appropriate in order to offer an objective analysis on existing research and how their own students’ views blend with developed literature in the area. The authors also offer their own know-how on how ePortfolios can be integrated as part of the postgraduate learning experience. The researchers identified ePortfolios as being a complementary tool that help educators and students to get a better understanding of the course material and offer students an opportunity to reflect on their own learning and course performance. They also identified a lack of research on how ePortfolios can be used as part of the students learning experience in postgraduate education specialised in finance.
Abrami, P., Wade, A., Pillay, V., Aslan, O., Bures, E. M., & Bentley, C. (2008). Encouraging self- regulated learning through electronic portfolios. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34(3).
Arter, J.A., & Spandel, V. (1992). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 11(1), 36-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1992.tb00230.x
Blackburn, J., & Hakel, M. (2006). Enhancing self-regulation and goal orientation with ePortfolios. In Jafari & Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on eportfolios (pp. 83-89). Hershey, PA: Idea Group. Reference. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-890-1.ch009
Epstein R.M., & E. M. Hundert. 2002. Defining and assessing professional competence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(2), 226–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.2.226
Ring, G., & Ramirez, B. (2012). Implementing ePortfolios for the assessment of general education competencies. International Journal of ePortfolio, 2(1), 87-97.
Heinrich, E., Bhattacharya, M., & Rayudu, R. (2007). Preparation for lifelong learning using ePortfolios. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 653-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03043790701520602
Hounsell, D. 2008. The trouble with feedback: New challenges, emerging strategies. Interchange, 2, 1-9.
Hyllyer, J., & Ley, T. C. (1996). Portfolios and second graders’ self-assessments of their development as writers. Reading Improvement, 133, 148-159.
Lam, R. (2010). The Role of Self-Assessment in Students' Writing Portfolios: A Classroom Investigation. TESL Reporter, 43(2), 16-35.
MacIsaac, D., & Jackson, L. (1994). Assessment processes and outcomes: Portfolio construction. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 62, 63-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719946208
Mills-Courts, K., & Amiran, M. R. (1991). Metacognition and the use of portfolios. In P. Belanoff & M. Dickson (Eds.), Portfolios process and product. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers Heinemann.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Perry, N.E (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 715-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-06188.8.131.525
Putwain, D. W., & Daly, A. L. (2013). Do clusters of test anxiety and academic buoyancy differentially predict academic performance? Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 157-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.010
Riedinger, B. (2006) Mining for meaning: Teaching students how to reflect. In Jafari & Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on ePortfolios (pp. 90-10). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Roberts, P., & Maor, D. (2012). ePortfolios to scaffold the development of reflective practice in bachelor of education students. In World conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education, (pp. 1274-1279). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Rogers, D., & Swan, K. (2004). Self-regulated learning and Internet search. College Record, 106(9), 804-1824.
Vucko, S. (2003). Going beyond I like it in a portfolio context: Scaffolding the development of six grade two learners' reflections [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Department of Education, Concordia University, Montreal, GC.
Way, D. G. (n.d.). Teaching Evaluation Handbook. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wickersham, L. E., & Chambers, S. M. (2006). ePortfolios: Using technology to enhance and assess student learning. Education-Indianapolis Then Chula Vista, 126(4), 738-746.
Yusuf, J., & Tuisawau, P. (2010). Student attitudes towards the use of ePortfolios: Experiences from the University of the South Pacific. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 31-41.
Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, pp. 329-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.2069
Copyright (c) 2015 Lucia Morales, Amparo Soler Dominguez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with HLRC agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication. Authors grant Laureate Education, Inc. a license to publish and distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in HLRC.
- Authors who submit manuscripts are to declare that their submission to HLRC is not simultaneously under consideration for publication in another journal and has not been published elsewhere previously.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the HLRC's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in HLRC.
- Pre-refereeing and pre-publication: To ensure consistency in the information available to researchers and to safeguard the blind peer-review process, authors are asked to abstain from self-archiving or posting online the submitted manuscript before the review process is complete.
- Post-refereeing and post-publication: Authors are free to self-archive and distribute the peer-reviewed and editorially reviewed version of their work. As a full open access journal, there is no embargo period. Authors are encouraged to archive the published PDF version, which includes a suggested citation with all pertinent information, including a digital object identifier (DOI). If the author decides to self-archive or distribute the work in a format other than the published PDF, the author must include the assigned DOI and acknowledge the work was first published in HLRC.