Best practices in doctoral retention: Mentoring
The aim of this critical literature review is to outline best practices in doctoral retention and the successful approach of one university to improve graduation success by providing effective mentorship for faculty and students alike. The focus of this literature review is on distance learning relationships between faculty and doctoral students, regarding retention, persistence, and mentoring models. Key phrases and words used in the search and focusing on mentoring resulted in over 20,000 sources. The search was narrowed to include only doctoral study and mentoring. Research questions of interest were: Why do high attrition rates exist for doctoral students? What are the barriers to retention? What are the benefits of doctoral mentoring? What programs do institutions have in place to reduce attrition? The researchers found a key factor influencing doctoral student retention and success is effective faculty mentorship. In particular, the design of a mentoring and faculty training program to increase retention and provide for success after graduation is important. This research represents a key area of interest in the retention literature, as institutions continue to search for ways to better support students during their doctoral programs and post-graduation.
Ampaw, F. D., & Jaeger, A. J. (2012). Completing the three stages of doctoral education: An event history analysis. Research in Higher Education, 53(6), 640-660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9250-3
Barnes, B. J., & Austin, A. E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor's perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 297-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x
Black, R. (2012). The dissertation marathon. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 5(2), 97-104. Retrieved from http://www.cluteinstitute.com
Cochran, J. D., Campbell, S. M., Baker, H. M., & Leeds, E. M. (2014). The role of student characteristics in predicting retention in online courses. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 27-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9305-8
Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 & 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50, 525-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s/11162-009-9130-2
Espino, M. M., Munoz, S. M., & Kiyama, J. M. (2010). Transitioning from doctoral study to the academy: Theorizing trenzas of identity for Latina sister scholars. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 804-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383123
Ewing, H., Mathieson, K., Alexander, J. L., & Leafman, J. (2012). Enhancing the acquisition of research skills in online doctoral programs: The Ewing model©. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 34-44. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org
Ford, L., & Vaughn, C. (2011). Working together more than alone: Students’ evolving perceptions of self community within a four-year educational administration doctoral cohort. The Qualitative Report, 16(6), 1645-1668. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu
Girves, J. E., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(2), 163-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1981691
Grant-Vallone, E., & Ensher, E. A. (2000). Effects of peer mentoring on types of mentor support, program satisfaction and graduate student stress: A dyadic perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 41(6), 637-642. Retrieved from http://www.jcsdonline.org
Gregoric, C., & Wilson, A. (2012). Informal Peer Mentoring During the Doctoral Journey: Perspectives of Two Postgraduate Students. In M. Kiley (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Quality in Postgraduate Research Conference: Narratives of Transition: Perspectives of Research Leaders, Educators and Postgraduates (pp. 83-92). Retrieved from http://chelt.anu.edu.au
Hadijoannou, X., Shelton, N. R., Fu, D., & Dhanarattigannon, J. (2007). The road to a doctoral degree: Co-travelers through a perilous passage. College Student Journal, 41(1), 160-176. Retrieved from http://www.questia.com
Heinrich, K. T. (2005). Halfway between receiving and giving: A relational analysis of doctorate- prepared nurse-scholars’ first 5 years after graduation. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(5), 303-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.07.004
Holley, K. A., & Caldwell, M. L. (2012). The challenges of designing and implementing a doctoral student mentoring program. Innovative Higher Education, 37(3), 243-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9203-y
Holmes, B. D., Robinson, L., Seay, A. D. (2010). Getting to finished: Strategies to ensure completion of the doctoral dissertation. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(7), 1-8. Retrieved from http://journals.cluteonline.com
Kaplan, K. (2012). Postgraduate options: Academia misses the mark. Nature, 485, 535-536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nj7399-535a
Kowalczyk, N., & Truluck, C. (2013). Literature reviews and systematic reviews: What is the difference? Radiologic Technology, 85(2), 219-222. Retrieved from http://www.asrt.org
Ku, H.-Y., Lahman, M. K. E., Yeh, H.-T., & Cheng, Y. - C. (2008). Into the academy: Preparing and mentoring international doctoral students. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 56(3), 365-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9083-0
Leeds, E., Campbell, S., Baker, H., Ali, R., Brawley, D., & Crisp, J. (2013). The impact of student retention strategies: An empirical study. International Journal of Management in Education, 7(1/2), 22–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijmie.2013.050812
Lim, J. H., Dannels, S. A., & Watkins, R. (2008). Qualitative investigation of doctoral students’ learning experiences in online research methods courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3), 223-236. Retrieved from http://www.infoagepub.com
Linden, J., Ohlin, M., & Brodin, E. M. (2013). Mentorship, supervision & learning experience in PhD education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 639-662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.596526
Lovitts, B. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn’t and why. Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 296-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0006
Lunsford, L. G. (2011). Psychology of mentoring: The case of talented college students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(3), 474-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200305
Martinez, E., Ordu, C., Della Sala, M. R., & McFarlane, A. (2013). Striving to obtain a school-work-life balance: The full-time doctoral student. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 39-59. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.us
McAlpine, L., Jazvac-Martek, M., & Hopwood, N. (2009). Doctoral student experience: Activities and difficulties influencing identity development. International Journal for Researcher Development, 1(1), 97-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/1759751X201100007
Mullen, C. A. (2007). Trainers, illusionists, tricksters, and escapists: Changing the doctoral circus. The Educational Forum, 71(4), 300-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131720709335021
Nimer, M. (2009). The doctoral cohort model: Increasing opportunities for success. College Student Journal, 43(4), 1373-1379. Retrieved from http://www.questia.com
Nurmi, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2002). Goal construction, reconstruction and depressive symptoms in a life-span context: The transition from school to work. Journal of Personality, 70(3), 385-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.05009
Peterson, E. (1999). Building scholars: A qualitative look at mentoring in a criminology and criminal justice doctoral program. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 10(2), 247-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511259900084571
Pinheiro, D., Melkers, J., & Youtie, J. (2014). Learning to play the game: Student publishing as an indicator of future scholarly success. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81, 56-66 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.008
Pilbeam, C., Lloyd-Jones, G., & Denyer, D. (2013). Leveraging value in doctoral student networks through social capital. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1472-1489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.636800
Pyhalto, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students of becoming a scholar. ISRN Education, 2012, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/934941
Rose, G. L. (2005). Group differences in graduate students’ concepts of the ideal mentor. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 53-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-6289-4
Smith, C. (2012). (Re) discovering meaning: A tale of two losses. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(10), 862-867. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800412456962
Stevens, D. D., Emil, S., & Yamashita, M. (2010). Mentoring through reflective journal writing: A qualitative study by a mentor/professor and two international graduate students. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 11(3), 347- 367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2010.490069
Sugimoto, C. R. (2012). Are you my mentor? Identifying mentors and their roles in LIS doctoral education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 53(1), 2-19. Retrieved from http://jelis.org
The 7th International Conference. (2012). American Institute of Higher Education Conference Proceedings, 5(1), 1-571. Retrieved from http://www.amhighed.com
Thien, A. H., & Beach, R. (2010). Mentoring doctoral students towards publication within the scholarly communities of practice. In C. Aitchison, B. Kamler, & A. Lee (Eds.), Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond (pp.117-137). New York, NY: Rutledge
Webb, A., Wangmo, T., Ewen, H. H., Teaster, P. B., & Hatch L. R. (2009). Educational Gerontology, 35(12), 1089-1106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03601270902917869
West, I. J. Y., Gokalp, G., Pena, E. V., Fischer, L., & Gupton, J. (2011).Exploring effective support practices for doctoral students’ degree completion. College Student Journal, 45(2), 310-323. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.biz
Yob, I., & Crawford, L. (2012). Conceptual framework for mentoring doctoral students. Higher Learning Research Communications, 2(2), 34-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v2i2.66
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with HLRC agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication. Authors grant Laureate Education, Inc. a license to publish and distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in HLRC.
- Authors who submit manuscripts are to declare that their submission to HLRC is not simultaneously under consideration for publication in another journal and has not been published elsewhere previously.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the HLRC's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in HLRC.
- Pre-refereeing and pre-publication: To ensure consistency in the information available to researchers and to safeguard the blind peer-review process, authors are asked to abstain from self-archiving or posting online the submitted manuscript before the review process is complete.
- Post-refereeing and post-publication: Authors are free to self-archive and distribute the peer-reviewed and editorially reviewed version of their work. As a full open access journal, there is no embargo period. Authors are encouraged to archive the published PDF version, which includes a suggested citation with all pertinent information, including a digital object identifier (DOI). If the author decides to self-archive or distribute the work in a format other than the published PDF, the author must include the assigned DOI and acknowledge the work was first published in HLRC.