Supporting online faculty: Developing a supporting website resource

  • Eric Nordin Grand Canyon University Staff/Faculty
  • Peter John Anthony Walden University
Keywords: Online faculty, online resources, faculty support, faculty needs, communication, connectivity


Current trends in post-secondary education enrollment indicate that colleges and universities are likely to experience an increase in the number of online students. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the type of resources and support features online faculty need, desire, and expect in a support website. The method used to collect research findings was an online survey. The participants for this study consisted of the online faculty population at an institution of higher learning in the southwestern United States. Participants were invited by email to participate in a 13 question survey which asked participants to rate the importance of the questions listed. Of the 2,522 survey invitations e-mailed to potential participants, 380 responded with completed surveys, providing a response rate of 15.06%. Although this was a relativity low response rate, researchers felt the demographics of the respondents provided an accurate representation of the population studied. Findings from the survey indicated participants agree there is a need to implement a support website. Participants indicated the support website should provide support resources, communication forums, and resources to increase connectivity to the institution. The authors note providing online faculty with support websites could be a differentiation strategy to recruit and retain quality online faculty.

DOI: 10.18870/hlrc.v4i1.158

Author Biographies

Eric Nordin, Grand Canyon University Staff/Faculty
Completed Doctorate in Business Administration (DBA) in 2013 from Walden University and currently Grand Canyon University staff/faculty.
Peter John Anthony, Walden University

Doctoral Faculty

College of Busines and Technology

Dissertation Chair


Al-Salman, S. M. (2011). Faculty in online learning programs: Competencies and barriers to success. Journal of Applied Learning Technology. 1(4), 6-13. Retrieved from

Bakare, K. K., Zamzami, I. F., & Olowolayemo, A. (2012). Students' orientation towards interpersonal communication in online social networking sites. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 6(1), 36-44.

Bao, Y. (2009). Organizational resistance to performance-enhancing technological innovations: A motivation-threat-ability framework. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 24(2), 119-130.

Bekmeier-Feuerhahn, S., & Eichenlaub, A. (2010). What makes for trusting relationships in online communication? Journal of Communication Management, 14(4), 337-355.

Charalambos, V., Michalinos, Z., & Chamberline, R. (2004). The design of online learning communities: Critical issues. Education Media Journal, 41(2), 135-143.

Dykman, C. A., & Davis, C. K. (2008). Part one - The shift toward online education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(1), 11-16. Retrieved from

Folkers, D. (2005). Competing in the marketspace: Incorporating online education into higher education – An organizational perspective. Information Resources Management Journal, 18(1), 61-77.

Gareis, E. (2006). Virtual teams: A comparison of online communication channels. The Journal of Language for International Business, 17(2), 6-21. Retrieved from

Green, T., Alejandro, J., & Brown, A. H. (2009). The retention of experienced faculty in online distance education programs: Understanding factors that impact their involvement. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Education, 10(3), 1-15. Retrieved from

Hawkins, A. Graham, C. R., & Barbour, M. K. (2011). Everybody is their own island: Teacher disconnection in a virtual school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Education, 13(2), 124-146. Retrieved from

Herman, J. H. (2012). Faculty development programs: The frequency and variety of professional development programs available to online instructors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(5), 87-106. Retrieved from

Hewett, B. L., & Powers, C. E. (2007). Guest editor’s introduction: Online teaching and Learning: Preparation, development, and organizational communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 1-11.

Huang, X., & Hsiao, E. (2012). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online environment: Faculty experiences and perceptions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 15-30. Retrieved from

Inalhan, G. (2009). Attachments: The unrecognised link between employees and their workplace (in change management projects). Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 11(1), 17-37.

Junk, V., Deringer, N., & Junk, W. (2011). Techniques to engage the online learner. Research in Higher Education Journal, 10, 1-15. Retrieved from

Kuo, Y. C, Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A Predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 14(1), 16-39. Retrieved from

Maddix, M. A. (2013). Developing online learning communities. Christian Education Journal, 10(1), 139-148. Retrieved from

Marek, K. (2009). Learning to teach online: Creating a culture of support for faculty. Journal of Education for Library and Information Sciences, 50(4), 275-290. Retrieved from

Meloncon, L. (2007). Exploring electronic landscapes: Technical communication, online learning, and instructor preparedness. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 31-53.

Meyer, K. A., & McNeal, L. (2011). How online faculty improve student learning productivity. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(3), 37-53. Retrieved from

Murdock, J. L., & Williams, A. M. (2011). Creating an online learning community: Is it possible? Innovation in Higher Education, 36(5), 305-315.

Orr, R., Williams, M. R., & Pennington, K. (2009). Institutional efforts to support faculty in online education. Innovation in Higher Education, 34(4), 257-268.

Peltier, J. W., Schibrosky, J. A., & Drago, W. (2007). The interdependence of the factors influencing the perceived quality of the online learning experience: A casual model. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(2), 140-153.

Schallock, D. R. (2009). A space for gray: The dialogue between diverse voices. The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations, 9(5), 1-12. Retrieved from

Simmons, K. D., Shumack, K., & Carpenter, L. (2011). Practical techniques for teaching online: Lessons from the trenches. National Teacher Education Journal, 4(4), 47-54. Retrieved from

Sutherland-Smith, W., & Saltmarsh, S. (2010). Minding the ‘P’s for implementing online education: Purpose, pedagogy, and practicalities. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(7), 64-77.

Vaill, A. L., & Testori, P. A. (2012). Orientation, mentoring, and ongoing support: A three-tiered approach to online faculty development. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 111-119. Retrieved from

Way, A. D, & Austin, C. M. (2012). The epersona: Improving online communication, and developing friendships. Business Education Innovation Journal, 4(2), 58-65. Retrieved from

Wen, D., Cuzzola, J., Brown, L., & Kinshuk. (2012). Instructor-aided asynchronous question answering system for online education and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 13(5), 103-125. Retrieved from

Wise, A. (2011). Supporting future faculty in developing their teaching practices: An exploration of communication networks among graduate teaching assistants. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 135-149. Retrieved from

Wood, B. J. G., Tapsall, S. M., & Soutar, G. N. (2005). Borderless education: Some implications for management. The International Journal of Education Management, 19(5), 428-436.

How to Cite
Nordin, E., & Anthony, P. (2014). Supporting online faculty: Developing a supporting website resource. Higher Learning Research Communications, 4(1), 30-45.