Supporting online faculty: Developing a supporting website resource
Current trends in post-secondary education enrollment indicate that colleges and universities are likely to experience an increase in the number of online students. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the type of resources and support features online faculty need, desire, and expect in a support website. The method used to collect research findings was an online survey. The participants for this study consisted of the online faculty population at an institution of higher learning in the southwestern United States. Participants were invited by email to participate in a 13 question survey which asked participants to rate the importance of the questions listed. Of the 2,522 survey invitations e-mailed to potential participants, 380 responded with completed surveys, providing a response rate of 15.06%. Although this was a relativity low response rate, researchers felt the demographics of the respondents provided an accurate representation of the population studied. Findings from the survey indicated participants agree there is a need to implement a support website. Participants indicated the support website should provide support resources, communication forums, and resources to increase connectivity to the institution. The authors note providing online faculty with support websites could be a differentiation strategy to recruit and retain quality online faculty.
Bakare, K. K., Zamzami, I. F., & Olowolayemo, A. (2012). Students' orientation towards interpersonal communication in online social networking sites. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 6(1), 36-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17504971211216300
Bao, Y. (2009). Organizational resistance to performance-enhancing technological innovations: A motivation-threat-ability framework. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 24(2), 119-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08858620910931730
Bekmeier-Feuerhahn, S., & Eichenlaub, A. (2010). What makes for trusting relationships in online communication? Journal of Communication Management, 14(4), 337-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13632541011090446
Charalambos, V., Michalinos, Z., & Chamberline, R. (2004). The design of online learning communities: Critical issues. Education Media Journal, 41(2), 135-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523980410001678593
Dykman, C. A., & Davis, C. K. (2008). Part one - The shift toward online education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(1), 11-16. Retrieved from http://jise.org/index.html
Folkers, D. (2005). Competing in the marketspace: Incorporating online education into higher education – An organizational perspective. Information Resources Management Journal, 18(1), 61-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2005010105
Gareis, E. (2006). Virtual teams: A comparison of online communication channels. The Journal of Language for International Business, 17(2), 6-21. Retrieved from http://www.periodicals.com/html/ihp_e.html?ej53953
Green, T., Alejandro, J., & Brown, A. H. (2009). The retention of experienced faculty in online distance education programs: Understanding factors that impact their involvement. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Education, 10(3), 1-15. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl
Hawkins, A. Graham, C. R., & Barbour, M. K. (2011). Everybody is their own island: Teacher disconnection in a virtual school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Education, 13(2), 124-146. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl
Herman, J. H. (2012). Faculty development programs: The frequency and variety of professional development programs available to online instructors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(5), 87-106. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main
Hewett, B. L., & Powers, C. E. (2007). Guest editor’s introduction: Online teaching and Learning: Preparation, development, and organizational communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10572250709336574
Huang, X., & Hsiao, E. (2012). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online environment: Faculty experiences and perceptions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 15-30. Retrieved from http://www.aect.org/
Inalhan, G. (2009). Attachments: The unrecognised link between employees and their workplace (in change management projects). Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 11(1), 17-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14630010910940534
Junk, V., Deringer, N., & Junk, W. (2011). Techniques to engage the online learner. Research in Higher Education Journal, 10, 1-15. Retrieved from http://www.aabri.com/rhej.html
Kuo, Y. C, Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A Predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 14(1), 16-39. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl
Maddix, M. A. (2013). Developing online learning communities. Christian Education Journal, 10(1), 139-148. Retrieved from http://journals.biola.edu/cej
Marek, K. (2009). Learning to teach online: Creating a culture of support for faculty. Journal of Education for Library and Information Sciences, 50(4), 275-290. Retrieved from http://www.alise.org/jelis
Meloncon, L. (2007). Exploring electronic landscapes: Technical communication, online learning, and instructor preparedness. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 31-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10572250709336576
Meyer, K. A., & McNeal, L. (2011). How online faculty improve student learning productivity. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(3), 37-53. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln
Murdock, J. L., & Williams, A. M. (2011). Creating an online learning community: Is it possible? Innovation in Higher Education, 36(5), 305-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9188-6
Orr, R., Williams, M. R., & Pennington, K. (2009). Institutional efforts to support faculty in online education. Innovation in Higher Education, 34(4), 257-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10755-009-9111-6
Peltier, J. W., Schibrosky, J. A., & Drago, W. (2007). The interdependence of the factors influencing the perceived quality of the online learning experience: A casual model. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(2), 140-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0273475307302016
Schallock, D. R. (2009). A space for gray: The dialogue between diverse voices. The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations, 9(5), 1-12. Retrieved from http://ijd.cgpublisher.com/
Simmons, K. D., Shumack, K., & Carpenter, L. (2011). Practical techniques for teaching online: Lessons from the trenches. National Teacher Education Journal, 4(4), 47-54. Retrieved from http://www.ntejournal.com/
Sutherland-Smith, W., & Saltmarsh, S. (2010). Minding the ‘P’s for implementing online education: Purpose, pedagogy, and practicalities. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(7), 64-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n7.6
Vaill, A. L., & Testori, P. A. (2012). Orientation, mentoring, and ongoing support: A three-tiered approach to online faculty development. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 111-119. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main
Way, A. D, & Austin, C. M. (2012). The epersona: Improving online communication, and developing friendships. Business Education Innovation Journal, 4(2), 58-65. Retrieved from http://www.beijournal.com/
Wen, D., Cuzzola, J., Brown, L., & Kinshuk. (2012). Instructor-aided asynchronous question answering system for online education and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 13(5), 103-125. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl
Wise, A. (2011). Supporting future faculty in developing their teaching practices: An exploration of communication networks among graduate teaching assistants. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 135-149. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
Wood, B. J. G., Tapsall, S. M., & Soutar, G. N. (2005). Borderless education: Some implications for management. The International Journal of Education Management, 19(5), 428-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513540510607752
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with HLRC agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication. Authors grant Laureate Education, Inc. a license to publish and distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in HLRC.
- Authors who submit manuscripts are to declare that their submission to HLRC is not simultaneously under consideration for publication in another journal and has not been published elsewhere previously.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the HLRC's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in HLRC.
- Pre-refereeing and pre-publication: To ensure consistency in the information available to researchers and to safeguard the blind peer-review process, authors are asked to abstain from self-archiving or posting online the submitted manuscript before the review process is complete.
- Post-refereeing and post-publication: Authors are free to self-archive and distribute the peer-reviewed and editorially reviewed version of their work. As a full open access journal, there is no embargo period. Authors are encouraged to archive the published PDF version, which includes a suggested citation with all pertinent information, including a digital object identifier (DOI). If the author decides to self-archive or distribute the work in a format other than the published PDF, the author must include the assigned DOI and acknowledge the work was first published in HLRC.