Tracking and explaining credit-hour completion
This study highlights factors associated with changes in earned hours for two cohorts of incoming freshmen during their first year. The objectives of this study are twofold: (a) to derive model(s) regressing the cumulative hours earned and differential hours earned on student demographic, socioeconomic, and academic characteristics; and (b) to provide succinct conclusions that will increase students’ satisfactory academic progress (SAP) based on the results. The study sample of 1,598 cases is made up of students from two cohorts of first-time, four-year degree-seeking students who started in the Fall semesters of 2010 and 2011, respectively. There were two measures of the dependent variable: Cumulative hours earned and the difference in earned hours between the Fall and Spring semesters. Multiple linear regression was used to explain the outcome variables using a student’s demographic, socioeconomic, and academic characteristics. The study found that there have been changes at Cameron University related to the freshman first year experience, while there were no significant differences detected between the 2010 and 2011 cohorts. In addition, demographic variables generally did not significantly explain earned hours or changes in earned hours. The significant predictors were generally tied to a student academic standing or factors for which the institution can exercise some control.
ACT. (2013). National Ranks for Test Scores and Composite Score. Retrieved from http://www.actstudent.org/
Bahr, P. R. (2009). Educational attainment as process: Using hierarchical discrete-time event history analysis to model rate of progress. Research in Higher Education, 50, 691-714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9135-x
Bivin, D., & Rooney, P. M. (1999). Forecasting credit hours. Research in Higher Education, 40(5), 613-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018704712802
Boughan, K. (1999). Above the bottom line: Assessing academic through-put by means of aggregate course hour analysis. 26th Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 27-37). Newport, RI: North East Association for Institutional Research.
Graunke, S. S., & Woosley, S. A. (2005). An exploration of factors that affect the academic success of college sophomores. College Student Journal, 39, 367-76.
Hargrove, K. S., & Ding, D. (2004, October). An analysis of BSIE degree completion time at Morgan State University. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Engineering Education, Gainesville, FL.
Levitz, R. S., Noel, L., & Richter, B. J. (1999). Strategic moves for retention success. New Directions for higher education, 99(108), 31-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/he.10803
Marsh, C. M., Vandehey, M. A., & Diekhoff, G. M. (2008). A Comparison of an introductory course to SAT/ACT scores in predicting student performance. The Journal of General Education, 57(4), 244-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jge.0.0024
Maxwell, M. (1994). From access to success. A book of readings on college developmental education and assistance programs. In M. Maxwell (Ed.), Are the skills we are teaching obsolete? A review of recent research in reading and study skills (pp. 161-67). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
Smittle, P. (1995). Academic performance predictors for community college student assessment. Community College Review, 23(2), 37-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009155219502300204
The Council of State Governments. (2004). Florida looks to cut excess credit hours to save money. State News (Council of State Governments), 47(10), 5.
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college. Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
US Department of Education. (2013). Staying Eligible | Federal Student Aid. Retrieved from http://studentaid.ed.gov/
Copyright (c) 2014 Maxwell Ndigume Kwenda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with HLRC agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication. Authors grant Laureate Education, Inc. a license to publish and distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in HLRC.
- Authors who submit manuscripts are to declare that their submission to HLRC is not simultaneously under consideration for publication in another journal and has not been published elsewhere previously.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the HLRC's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in HLRC.
- Pre-refereeing and pre-publication: To ensure consistency in the information available to researchers and to safeguard the blind peer-review process, authors are asked to abstain from self-archiving or posting online the submitted manuscript before the review process is complete.
- Post-refereeing and post-publication: Authors are free to self-archive and distribute the peer-reviewed and editorially reviewed version of their work. As a full open access journal, there is no embargo period. Authors are encouraged to archive the published PDF version, which includes a suggested citation with all pertinent information, including a digital object identifier (DOI). If the author decides to self-archive or distribute the work in a format other than the published PDF, the author must include the assigned DOI and acknowledge the work was first published in HLRC.